Think Twice Before Taking the Covid Vaccination



ORIGINAL POST
Posted by Ed 46 days ago

Think Twice Before Taking the Covid Vaccination

Heidi Neckelmann

The love of my life, my husband Gregory Michael MD, an Obstetrician that had his office in Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach Died the day before yesterday due to a strong reaction to the COVID vaccine.

He was a very healthy 56 year old, loved by everyone in the community delivered hundreds of healthy babies and worked tireless through the pandemic.

He was vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine at MSMC on December 18, 3 days later he saw a strong set of petechiae on his feet and hands which made him seek attention at the emergency room at MSMC. The CBC that was done at his arrival showed his platelet count to be 0 (A normal platelet count ranges from 150,000 to 450,000 platelets per microliter of blood.)

 
He was admitted in the ICU with a diagnosis of acute ITP caused by a reaction to the COVID vaccine. A team of expert doctors tried for 2 weeks to raise his platelet count to no avail. Experts from all over the country were involved in his care. No matter what they did, the platelets count refused to go up.
 
He was conscious and energetic through the whole process but 2 days before a last resort surgery, he got a hemorrhagic stroke caused by the lack of platelets that took his life in a matter of minutes.
 

He was a pro vaccine advocate that is why he got it himself.

I believe that people should be aware that side effects can happened, that it is not good for everyone and in this case destroyed a beautiful life, a perfect family, and has affected so many people in the community

Do not let his death be in vain please save more lives by making this information news.

Read More

 

Johns Hopkins Scientist: ‘A Medical Certainty’ Pfizer Vaccine Caused Death of Florida Doctor

Read More


Please support our advertisers:
COMMENTS
Ed 46 days ago
Twenty-three people died in Norway within days of receiving their first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, with 13 of those deaths — all nursing home patients — apparently related to the side effects of the shots, health officials said.
 
https://nypost.com/2021/01/15/23-die-in-norway-after-receiving-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine/ 

Please support our advertisers:
Praddlecod 46 days ago
That's interesting, but I need more information before I'm going to be shying away from a vaccine. There are no doubt more severe side effects for some people, but I tend to be more cautious about misinformation spread by the antivax community since it's so rampant on the internet. It is new enough that some caution should be exercised, but do your own research and stick to the advice of the medical professionals. We almost completely got rid of measles until people started buying into some of the bogus vaccine info on Facebook and other places online. It's sad for the gentleman who passed away, but rejecting the scientific evidence and efficacy of vaccines seems like a strange battle to wage given how integral to human health vaccines have been for decades.

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 46 days ago
55 Americans Have Died Following COVID Vaccination, Norway Deaths Rise To 29
 
Amid increasing calls for suspension of the use of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines produced by companies such as Pfizer, especially among elderly people, the situation in Norway has escalated significantly as the Scandi nation has now registered a total of 29 deaths among people over the age of 75 who’ve had their first COVID-19 vaccination shot.
 

As Bloomberg reports, this adds six to the number of known fatalities in Norway, and also lowers the age group thought to be affected from 80.

Until Friday, Pfizer/BioNTech was the only vaccine available in Norway, and “all deaths are thus linked to this vaccine,” the Norwegian Medicines Agency said in a written response to Bloomberg on Saturday.

“There are 13 deaths that have been assessed, and we are aware of another 16 deaths that are currently being assessed,” the agency said.

All the reported deaths related to “elderly people with serious basic disorders,” it said.

“Most people have experienced the expected side effects of the vaccine, such as nausea and vomiting, fever, local reactions at the injection site, and worsening of their underlying condition.”

 
In addition to the deaths, people have reported 96 life-threatening events following COVID-19 vaccinations, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits.
 
 
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 44 days ago
Large Numbers Of Health Care And Frontline Workers Are Refusing Covid-19 Vaccine
 
Despite the Covid-19 death count in the United States rapidly accelerating, a startlingly high percentage of health care professionals and frontline workers throughout the country—who have been prioritized as early receipts of the coronavirus vaccine—are reportedly hesitant or outright refusing to take it, despite claims that the vaccines are safe and effective.
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 43 days ago
California Halts COVID Vaccinations From Moderna
 

After several people had apparent allergic reactions at one California clinic, state health officials on Sunday told providers across the state to pause administering doses from one COVID-19 vaccine lot that arrived from Moderna.

 

The move, made “out of an extreme abundance of caution,” means that 330,000 doses distributed to 287 providers across the state can’t be used amid an already slow vaccine rollout.

 

“A higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions were reported with a specific lot of Moderna vaccine administered at one community vaccination clinic,” California State Epidemiologist Dr. Erica Pan said.

 
https://www.news10.com/news/coronavirus/california-halts-moderna-vaccine-batch-after-allergic-reactions/ 
 

Please support our advertisers:
PestHit 41 days ago
I completely agree, you need to adapt to these viruses

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 36 days ago
Molecular Biologist Explains that SARS Vaccines Make Humans Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOS)
 

Dr. Dolores Cahill, PhD, is a Molecular Biologist/Immunologist and Professor at the University College of Dublin in Ireland.

She is an inventor, founder and shareholder of companies, and has been granted & licensed patents in Europe, the USA & worldwide with applications in improving the early accurate diagnosis of disease (autoimmune diseases & cancer).

She has more than 20 years of expertise in high-throughput protein & antibody array, proteomics technology development, automation & biomedical applications in biomarker discovery, diagnostics & personalized medicine.

Dr. Cahill recently did an interview explaining how previous peer-reviewed studies on SARS Coronavirus mRNA vaccines conducted on animals have had very negative results, which is why one has never been approved for humans.

One of the studies she discusses in this interview is a study published in 2012 titled: Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus.

So the issue when you inject messenger RNA was that if it had a protein from the virus like the spike protein, this plus positive RNA can go into our cells.

The spike protein from the virus is expressed in our cells, and may be exposed to the immune system when those cells die, and the body starts mounting an immune response, including an antibody response.

So let’s say that happens in December, and people would start doing that straight-away, so within two or three weeks that process would start.

But if in February, March, April another coronavirus is circulating naturally in 2021, that will be like a challenge with the natural, you know the SARS is one of the natural coronaviruses, or it could even be the common cold, that what happened in this study is that the animal models after they had been challenged, got very sick, and that some of them died.

So then it says in the last line in the abstract, it said:

“Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.” (Source.)
 

And so the name for this thing is “antibody dependent response,” or “cytokine storm,” or “immune priming” or “immune super priming.”

So this is why there has been no vaccine for decades licensed for coronavirus, because you get this issue that the messenger RNAs starts expressing the virus.

And then when it comes across the natural circulating coronavirus, it could be a month or a year, or 2 years down the road, that then the people get very, very ill very quickly with this cytokine storm.

And they also saw this in a respiratory vaccine, RSV. (See study.)

Most of the children who were given this RSV vaccine, which had the same issue. Most of the children experienced severe disease with infection, that led to a high frequency of hospitalizations.

And 2 children out of 35 died.

And the conclusion from this was that the disease was enhanced by the prior vaccination.

Dr. Cahill then explains that the effects of the mRNA vaccines will happen months later, and that we don’t want them being labeled as COVID deaths, when they are actually dying from the effects of the mRNA vaccines.

So what people need to know is that with these RNA vaccines, is that after you’re vaccinated, the rest of your life you will have much higher deaths in the children according to this study because you were vaccinated.

And when I came out with this in May 2020 (slide show presentation), is that the people may not make the connection, and what we do not want is that if there are significant deaths, say in February, March and April next year, that that is called Covid19 or Covid21.

We will have to monitor if the people who are dying, and there are predictions, that is why they are having the tender for large amounts of adverse events from the vaccine, is that if there is an increase in deaths, it is well-known, and we don’t want those deaths to be called Covid19 or Covid21.

They are, this issue with that vaccine, making people more sick than ever. There is a higher chance for death, not because of the circulated virus, but because of the vaccination, weeks or months ahead.

When asked to explain what “cytokine storm” means, Dr. Cahill continued:

 

The cytokine storm is when you put RNA genes, mRNA vaccine injected into your body, you bypass all of the natural immune response, which would (normally) build an immune response to prevent the vaccine from actually entering your body.

So suddenly the mRNA gets into your body, and it’s used as the human machinery in the cells to express the human proteins.

So that suddenly the virus has been injected into your body, and then your immune system sees the virus in your body as something that should not be there, and it mounts an immune response.

But the shocking thing is, that normally you’re immune and you can get rid of the virus particles. It’s a slow thing.

But when you inject it, this mRNA, why it’s so deadly, is that it now goes into your genes, and starts expressing. And it starts stimulating the immune response from inside your body, and you can’t get rid it because of the source of the viral protein. You now have become like a genetically modified organism.

 
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 36 days ago
Vaccine-induced Spike Antibodies: Havoc on the Lungs
 
 
When the coronavirus vaccine is injected, the mRNA contains “instructions” for building the spike protein that has been identified on the surface of the SARS-CoV2 virus. The cell’s reverse transcriptase enzymes are called into action, leading to the mass production of the spike (S) protein, the protein thought to play a vital role in its infectivity.
 

However, is this a good thing?
 

The 2019 study by Liu, Li et al, “Anti-spike IgG antibody causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection” is worthy of your time to read and study.
 

The investigation was undertaken to study the effect vaccine-induced, spike-protein antibodies have on preventing SARS-CoV infections and to examine the possible effect the spike-protein antibodies have on the immune system.
 

What the researchers discovered was startling.
 
https://vaxxter.com/covid-vaccines-part-2/

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 34 days ago
MUST WATCH!  Matt Hancock brought to tears on TV as first Covid vaccinations begin video
 
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 22 days ago
31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the Vaccine

by Chananya Weissman
1. It’s not a vaccine. A vaccine by definition provides immunity to a disease. This does not provide immunity to anything. In a best-case scenario, it merely reduces the chance of getting a severe case of a virus if one catches it. Hence, it is a medical treatment, not a vaccine. I do not want to take a medical treatment for an illness I do not have.
 
2. The drug companies, politicians, medical establishment, and media have joined forces to universally refer to this as a vaccine when it is not one, with the intention of manipulating people into feeling safer about undergoing a medical treatment. Because they are being deceitful, I do not trust them, and want nothing to do with their medical treatment.
 
3. The presumed benefits of this medical treatment are minimal and would not last long in any case. The establishment acknowledges this, and is already talking about additional shots and ever-increasing numbers of new “vaccines” that would be required on a regular basis. I refuse to turn myself into a chronic patient who receives injections of new pharmaceutical products on a regular basis simply to reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus that these injections do not even prevent.
 
4. I can reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus by strengthening my immune system naturally. In the event I catch a virus, there are vitamins and well-established drugs that have had wonderful results in warding off the illness, without the risks and unknowns of this medical treatment.
 
5. The establishment insists that this medical treatment is safe. They cannot possibly know this because the long-term effects are entirely unknown, and will not be known for many years. They may speculate that it is safe, but it is disingenuous for them to make such a claim that cannot possibly be known. Because they are being disingenuous, I do not trust them, and I want no part of their treatment.
 
6. The drug companies have zero liability if anything goes wrong, and cannot be sued. Same for the politicians who are pushing this treatment. I will not inject myself with a new, experimental medical device when the people behind it accept no liability or responsibility if something goes wrong. I will not risk my health and my life when they refuse to risk anything.
 
7. Israel’s Prime Minister has openly admitted that the Israeli people are the world’s laboratory for this experimental treatment. I am not interested in being a guinea pig or donating my body to science.
 
8. Israel agreed to share medical data of its citizens with a foreign drug company as a fundamental part of their agreement to receive this treatment. I never consented for my personal medical data to be shared with any such entity, nor was I even asked. I will not contribute to this sleazy enterprise.
 
9. The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. This is a preposterous excuse, and it takes an unbelievable amount of chutzpah to even say such a thing. Such a “line” is a figment of their own imagination; if they hogged a couple of injections for themselves no one would cry foul. In addition, billionaires with private jets and private islands are not known for waiting in line until hundreds of millions of peasants all over the world go first to receive anything these billionaires want for themselves.
 
10. The establishment media have accepted this preposterous excuse without question or concern. Moreover, they laud Pfizer’s executives for their supposed self-sacrifice in not taking their own experimental treatment until we go first. Since they consider us such fools, I do not trust them, and do not want their new treatment. They can have my place in line. I’ll go to the very back of the line.
 
https://gatesofvienna.net/2021/02/31-reasons-why-i-wont-take-the-vaccine/ 
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 21 days ago
Doctors Link Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines to Life-Threatening Blood Disorder
 
A second New York Times article quotes doctors who say the mRNA technology used in COVID vaccines may cause immune thrombocytopenia, a blood disorder that last month led to the death of a Florida doctor after his first dose of the Pfizer vaccine.
 
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-moderna-vaccines-life-threatening-blood-disorder/ 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 19 days ago
Are the hairs on the back of your neck standing up when you hear the mantra "get the vaccine" - "it's a matter of life or death?" You hear it everywhere - radio, tv, doctors, politicians, mainstream media, Hollywood stars, liberal and conservative alike, are all saying "get the vaccine." - "It’s safe."
 
Even your elevator music is saying you need to get the vaccine. All for what? a tough virus with the death rate of any seasonal flu. Is this adding up? When you put your critical thinking hat on, how can you not come to the conclusion there’s another agenda for the vaccines in the midst?
 
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nYF0Rta8hu80/ 
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 14 days ago
Optimism as Cuba set to test its own Covid vaccine https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-56069577

They got all the ingredients and instructions of off of www.makeyourowncovidvaccine.com

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 14 days ago

Whistleblower from Berlin nursing home: the terrible dying after vaccination

For the first time, there is an eyewitness report from a Berlin nursing home on the situation after the vaccination. It comes from the AGAPLESION Bethanien Havelgarten retirement home in Berlin-Spandau.

There, within four weeks after the first vaccination with the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine Comirnaty, eight of 31 seniors, who suffered from dementia but were in good physical condition according to their age before the vaccination, died.
 
The first death occurred after only six days, and five other seniors died approximately 14 days after vaccination. The first symptoms of the disease had already appeared shortly after the vaccination.
 
From information available to 2020News the patients have not been duly informed about the risks of this vaccine. One reason being that no detailed information about the novelty of this mRNA vaccine which has only conditionally been certified in the European Union have been provided.
 

Attorney at Law Viviane Fischer and Attorney at Law Dr. Reiner Füllmich of the Corona Committee spoke in a video interview with the whistleblower about the closer circumstances of the vaccination, the symptoms that occurred and the different nature of the deaths in temporal connection with the vaccination.

On January 3, 2021, 31 female and male residents of the dementia ward “ground floor/protected area” had been vaccinated with Comirnaty. Relatives of another three seniors had objected to vaccination, and two residents were in terminal care, so no vaccination was given.

The residents of this ward are very active, “self defending” dementia patients who are physically in good condition. They are allowed to move around the ward all day without restriction. The day before the vaccination, the 31 vaccinated persons were all in good health. A few days earlier, all had tested negative for Corona, according to the whistleblower report.

 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 14 days ago
https://hongkong.asiaxpat.com/Utility/GetImage.ashx?ImageID=8a2a7d3c-3334-4329-b31e-918b70cfa85d&refreshStamp=0 
After two decades the world's best scientists were unable to produce a safe and effective SARS Coronavirus vaccine... 
 
But in well under a year ... even Cuba looks to have joined the ranks of countries that has a Covid Coronavirus vaccine... using old gear inside their 'state of the art' labs!
 
 
Optimism as Cuba set to test its own Covid vaccine 
 
Some of the equipment at the Finlay Institute of Vaccines in Havana might be considered outdated elsewhere in the world but the science taking place behind its white-washed walls is cutting edge. 
 
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-56069577 
 

 
As it is now so simple to make great vaccines... we can expect vaccines for cancer, the common cold, TB, AIDS, Dengue, Malaria etc... by the end of 2021!!!!
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 13 days ago
If you were unsure about getting the vaccine... this Run DMC song will likely convince you to go ahead:
 
https://youtu.be/wB9RSffVys4 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 13 days ago
FYI - these vaccines are part of a massive experimental human trial.
 
The trials end in 2023.
 
The vaccine manufacturers state this on the gov website. These are the dates that the trials end:
 
Pfizer trials end on Jan 27th 2023 (See https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728)
AstraZeneca trials end in Feb 2023 (See https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516746
Moderna trials end in Dec 2023 (See https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03897881)

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 9 days ago
As a doctor, people ask me if it’s safe to take a new Covid vaccine. Given that criticism is risky, here’s my very careful answer
 
By Malcolm Kendrick, doctor and author who works as a GP in the National Health Service in England. His blog can be read here and his book, 'Doctoring Data – How to Sort Out Medical Advice from Medical Nonsense,' is available here.
 

The type of vaccine being developed against the virus has never – outside of Ebola – been used before. The trials have been extremely rushed & involved testing only small numbers. What could possibly go wrong?
 
 
Since the first positive results on vaccines have come out, a lot of people have asked me if I think everyone should take them? For some reason, a number of people out there trust my judgement on such things.
 

I noticed that the Daily Mail recently ran a poll, which showed that three quarters of Britons would agree to have a jab – although 40 percent wanted politicians to take it first to prove it was safe. Frankly, I pity any vaccine injected into certain politicians, as I am not certain it would survive.
 

UK terrorism chief calls for ‘national debate’ on criminalizing doubts about Covid-19 vaccine
Anyway, are the majority of Daily Mail readers right to be so enthusiastic about vaccination? I must admit that I write this article with some caution, because I am acutely aware that the slightest hint of criticism of a vaccine, any vaccine, is risky.
 

As I remarked to a friend recently, the moment anyone says ‘vaccine’, the only acceptable response is to leap to your feet and salute, whilst singing Ode to Joy. Followed by fifteen minutes of enthusiastic clapping. Failure to do so, means you are taken out and shot for thought crimes. Doubleplusgood, indeed.
 

The first thing I want to say here is that the type of vaccine being developed against Covid-19 has never been used before, outside of Ebola. Some people feel that they should not really be called vaccines, because they are completely different from anything that has gone before.
 

Up to now, vaccination has meant injecting a dead virus (or bacteria), or one that has been weakened and can only poorly replicate, or parts of the virus, or suchlike. Once inside the body, the immune system spots this ‘alien’ material, and creates a response against it, which will hopefully be remembered for years and years.
 

The next time the dangerous virus appears, the body will use the immune memory of something very similar, to wipe out the virus (or bacteria) at high speed, giving it no chance to do damage. The first ever ‘vaccine’ worked by using the cowpox virus to immunise against smallpox.
 

It had been noticed that milkmaids who caught cowpox, a relatively mild disease in humans, did not then get smallpox. It was Edward Jenner who wondered how, or why, this happened. In 1796, he scraped material from cowpox sores, and then scratched it into the skin of people uninfected with smallpox, to see if they would be protected.
 

AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine shows average efficacy of 70%
His first volunteer was a young boy, who he ‘immunised’ with cowpox scrapings. Jenner then tried to infect the boy with smallpox scrapings. A form of research that would be rather frowned upon today. Luckily, the young boy survived, and vaccination was born. Everything since has been a variation on this theme, of using a less dangerous ‘thing’ to create a defence against a damaging infection. Until now.
 

Now, we have a thing called a messenger RNA vaccine (mRNA). RNA is, effectively, a single strand of DNA – the double helix that sits within our cells and makes up our genetic code. Many viruses are made up of a single strand of RNA, surrounded by a protein sphere.
 

They enter the cell, take over the replication systems, make thousands of copies of themselves, then exit the cell. Sometimes killing the cell as they do so, sometimes exiting more gently. Covid19 (Sars-Cov2) is an RNA virus.
 

Knowing this, rather than attempting to create a weakened virus, which can take years, or break the virus into bits, the vaccine researchers decided to use Sars-Cov2’s RNA against itself. To do this, they isolated the section of RNA which codes for the ‘spike’ protein – which is the thing the virus uses as a ‘key’ to enter cells.
 

They then worked out how to insert this small section of RNA, messenger RNA, into the cell, where it takes over a part of the protein replication mechanisms that sit inside all cells. They turn the mechanism into a 3D printer, churning out copies of the spike protein.
 

These spike proteins then leave the cell – somehow or other, this bit is unclear. The immune system comes across them, recognises them as ‘alien’ and attacks. In doing so, antibodies are created, and the immune memory system kicks into action. If, later on, a Sars-Cov2 virus gets into the body, the immune system fires up and attacks the remembered spike protein. Hopefully killing the entire virus.
 

This is all, certainly very clever stuff. What, as they say, could possibly go wrong?
 

The first thing to say is that, with something this new, we don’t really know. It could be that it is absolutely 100 percent safe. We are told that none of the mRNA can get into the nucleus of the cell, where it could become incorporated into the DNA. I hope so. Could it trigger an immune cascade? I hope not.
 

I know that the researchers will be looking very, very, closely at the novel safety issues that could emerge. If they are not, they damned well should be. However, the timelines here are very short. It normally takes many years to create safe and effective vaccines. Here is it happening in, effectively, weeks.
 
 
The early stage human safety studies have been crammed very tightly together. In addition, we will also have very little information on such things as whether or not the vaccine actually reduces serious infections or death, as noted by Professor Haseltine in a recent article: “These [vaccine] protocols do not emphasize the most important ramifications of COVID-19 that people are most interested in preventing: overall infection, hospitalization, and death.” Prof. Haseltine also argues that the trials have all been “designed to succeed.”
 

The reality is that we are rushing and rushing. There are very good reasons for this rush, but I advise caution. Should everyone take the vaccine? Probably yes for those at highest risk of serious infection and death, where the potential benefit is high. As for anyone healthy, under the age of sixty, I would wait. As I shall be.
 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 7 days ago
Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
 
With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?
 

Many doctors and researchers around the world have promulgated concerns about the well-documented phenomena referred to as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) seen in some viruses such as coronaviruses.

In previous SARS, MERS, Dengue fever and RSV virus vaccine trials the exposure of wild viruses to vaccine recipients resulted in severe disease, cytokine storms, and deaths in some animal and human trials. The phenomenon of ADE did not present initially in vaccine recipients, rather it presented after vaccine recipients were exposed to wild viruses.

This is the reason we do not have a vaccine for the common cold, MERS and SARS which is 78% homologous with SarsCov2 (based on analysis of the digital genome). Immunology Professor Dolores Cahill warned that this disease enhancement may cause many vaccine recipients to die months or years down the road. Esteemed German infectious disease specialist, Dr Sucharit Bhakdi opined:

 
https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/ 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 6 days ago

Dr Mike Yeadon’s Open Letter Regarding SARS-COV-2 Vaccine 

It is increasingly difficult to retrieve a copy of Dr Mike Yeadon’s, (ex VP of Pfizer), open letter to Matt Hancock regarding the new SARS-COV-2 vaccine, so, along with his Bio, I am posting it on this blog. In it, he explicitly states that he is not against vaccinations in general – his concern is with the lack of data regarding the long-term effects of any vaccination developed in less than a year. Imperative reading.

Bio:

Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.

Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.

Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.

Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.

Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.

 
Dear Mr Hancock,
 

I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin.

I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D. I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset.
 
 

All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months. If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.

This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.
 
My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t). Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development- should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis.
 
That’s my concern.
 
And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing. You have literally no data on this & neither does anyone else. It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing.
 
No: it is that you have no idea what will happen yet, despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do. Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines.
 
 

There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development & to waive absent safety information on this occasion. I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population.

We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus. Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit, including the sole point I make here.
 

Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used. I don’t trust you. You’ve not been straightforward & have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis. You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines?

Dr Michael Yeadon

 
An ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION has been filed by Dr Mike Yeadon with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the new Pfizer COVID vaccine that has been submitted for “emergency use authorization” (EUA). 
 
 
Watch an Interview with Dr. Mike Yeadon 

Please support our advertisers:
Ed 5 days ago

Spain’s Galicia to make Covid vaccine compulsory and fine those who refuse it up to €60K

The regional government of Galicia in northwestern Spain has announced that the Covid-19 vaccine will be compulsory for all its 2.7 million inhabitants, and that fines for those who don’t follow the rules will go from €1,000 to €60,000.

https://www.thelocal.es/20210223/spains-galicia-to-make-covid-vaccine-compulsory-and-fine-those-who-refuse-it-up-to-60k


Please support our advertisers:
Ed 1 day ago

If a person is vaccinated against COVID-19, will they still be able to spread the virus to susceptible people?

An ideal vaccine will stop everyone from carrying the infection as well as protecting them from becoming seriously ill. It is currently unclear whether the vaccine only protects against symptomatic and severe disease, or if it can also stop all infection, including asymptomatic infection (i.e. showing no symptoms).

 
If the vaccine is only able to stop the symptoms of the disease, but unable to stop the virus from infecting us and reproducing, then the virus may still be able to be spread.
 
Auckland University Read More 
 
 
 

vaccine
/ˈvaksiːn,ˈvaksɪn/
noun
  1. a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.
 
 
So these are not vaccines... they are treatments.  Read More 

Please support our advertisers:

< Back to main category



Login now