Landlord rights / security deposit



ORIGINAL POST
Posted by earthwalker7 15 days ago
Question on security deposits and tenant/landlord conflict.

Where does one find out information about landlord rights, and to what extent we can withhold security deposits from tenant misuse of the property and its equipment, which results in material long-term damage?

Background: I own an apartment in HK, which has a very large patio. We have an awning over that patio which can be extended and retracted with a remote control. There are also some 20 floors above us which overlook the patio, and sadly every day some people above will throw some debris down. We rented the apartment out to a local HKer tenant. The tenant insisted in having the remote control to the awning, and stated he planned to extend the awning in a permanent/semi-permanent basis. We objected, because we felt that long-term extension of the awning could damage the awning arms and mechanism, and would potentially result in damage to the awning from debris from the above floors.

We came to a verbal agreement with the tenant that he would only extend the awning by 3 feet. Nine months have passed, and in our recent visit to the apartment we have seen that indeed the tenant permanently and fully extended the awning out to its full length, and that indeed this has caused the awning mechanism to be broken and non-functional.

What is our recourse? How can we document his malfeasance and what legal action can we take? Should we file a complaint with the Building Department? What can we do, as we now do need to withhold part of the security deposit to cover the damage caused to the awning mechanism? Thanks.

Please support our advertisers:
COMMENTS
bananaq 13 days ago
I believed the reason why you installed that awning on the first place is safety as you mention debris falling from above floors. What is the use of that awning if you will not extend it for the protection of the people using the patio. Also your worried that the awning will be damage by the falling debris so what is the use of installing it. Just for decoration?
 
I believed the tenant rented your place because of the patio. For the part of the tenant they should retract the awning when not in use as the wind in HK is quite strong.
 
I think both you and the tenant has problem.
 
 
You have a problem of installing the awning but you don't want to use it because it might got damage from the debris.
 
The tenant misuse the awning by continuously extending the awning for longer period of time. they should retract it when not in use.
 
I believed you can both work this out.

Please support our advertisers:

< Back to main category



Login now