Does the Centaline Index accurately reflect Market prices ?
This is something I have been looking at recently, and I think it does. Specifically, if you wonder about how well movements in the Index are reflecting in price movements for individual areas, the answer I found is that prices all around HK correlate well with the Centaline index.
[img]
Read More
This chart contains four indices, and is pretty busy, so I had better explain it.
We are looking at mostly monthly intervals since 2010, and let's start with the Blue line:
+ Blue: Centaline index multiplied by 100
(Example: July 29, 2012: 106.54 x 100 = $10,654 )
+ Red: Taikoo Shing : $10,689 psf (at 7/29/12)
+ Green: Park Avenue : $11,145 psf (7/29/12)
+ Yellow: Island Harbourview : $9,663 psf (7/29/12)
Not only was 100x the Index a good proxy for Per Square Foot prices in the main two developments, but each of those, Taikoo Shing and Park Avenue/Park Central correlate well with each other - They provide good benchmarks for Hong Kong Island and West Kowloon.
I find it a bit surprising to find the prices for these two are so close to each other. Taikoo Shing is an old area, with dated and rundown housing stock, in crowded conditions. By contrast, the buildings which comprize Park Avenue/Central Park in West Kowloon near Olympic station - Is much more modern, and feels much less crowded. It continues to surprise me that HK people pay such high prices for inferior housing stock just because it is on HK Island. The journey by MTR from Olympic station is actually a bit faster to HK Station, than from TKS to Central. (Having said that, there is then a 5-6 minutes walk from HK station to Central.)
Is that little walk really worth living in a 25 years older building? To me, it is not.