Amparo Kia, in your last post you segued from a shaky critique of my post to some sort of meta indictment of the United States as a debtor nation.
Here's the deal: you're entitled to your own opinion but not to your own facts.
You can make a case that Western cultures are as money-obsessed as Chinese culture generally is when you can produce evidence of Westerners burning (or otherwise transmitting to the nether realm) gigantic wads of paper cash (to bribe the guards in Hell, naturally), paper houses, paper servants, etc.
As for the American govt being in debt and China/HK/Macau sitting on top of large financial reserves, a couple of points have occurred to me that you might like to consider.
(1.) Chinese people in general have more faith in the future stability and prosperity of the United States than they do of China. Why else would non-English-speaking pregnant ladies from China and the ROC be paying top dollar to human traffickers to help them secure American citizenship for their children by arranging to give birth in the USA?
Read More
(2.) The more educated a Mainland person is, the more likely they are to want to emigrate to the United States:
Read More
(3.) If cash handouts to the public are in some way a measure of how "good" a place is (the vibe that I'm getting from your post), then Alaska (a US state) is even better than HK and Macau put together! In 2010, for instance, the Alaska Permanent Fund paid each Alaskan a dividend of $USD 1281:
Read More Are you packing your bags for Alaska now?
(4.) Doesn't it strike you as curious that, in a thread where you refute the notion that Chinese culture is money-obsessed, you've brought up "hush money" payments made by HK and Macau governments to their residents? Those payments are being made to quell dissent and anger at political and social ills ... which wouldn't really work in your average Western country. It does work fairly well here, though, which goes to prove that much greater importance is attached to money here than elsewhere.